Pacific Decadal Oscillation

The "Pacific Decadal Oscillation" (PDO) is a long-lived El Niño-like pattern of Pacific climate variability.


( It's very funny that the climate changes over the last 120 years fit somewhat closely with the pattern of the PDO. And man is creating the climate change??
Though the PDO cannot explain all the changes from year to year weather, it is but one of so many natural occurrences that are part of the big picture of global climate change that dwarfs any effect man-made greenhouse gases.
Brrrrr its cold today!)

Several independent studies find evidence for just two full PDO cycles in the past century: "cool" PDO regimes prevailed from 1890-1924 and again from 1947-1976, while "warm" PDO regimes dominated from 1925-1946 and from 1977 through (at least) the mid-1990's. Shoshiro Minobe has shown that 20th century PDO fluctuations were most energetic in two general periodicities, one from 15-to-25 years, and the other from 50-to-70 years.

As Usual

Earlier in the year..... wow burning hot !!! (be sure to read the "related story" titles)
February 24, 2007 - 6:54 PM
Winter in Switzerland is warmest on record

::Related stories Swiss Re signs climate change pact
Taking the temperature of ski resorts
Swiss hope to benefit from EU car emission cap
UN panel issues tough climate change verdict ::

Temperatures have been three degrees Celsius higher than average over the past three months, in what has been the warmest winter since measurements began 140 years ago.



Oops spoke too soon, later this year:



November 12, 2007 - 11:59 AM
Snowiest start to winter in 55 years

::Related stories:Winter in Switzerland is warmest on record
Tourist industry faces climate dilemma
Snow future for alpine tourism? ::

Up to 120 centimetres of snow has fallen on the Swiss Alps since Friday, the largest amount at the start of winter for over five decades – and more is expected.
Tourism authorities in ski resorts are rubbing their hands, not only because of the low temperatures but also in expectation of a record season.
The southeastern resort of Davos in eastern Switzerland, which lies at 1,560m, saw 62cm of snow fall within 24 hours, according to the national weather service MeteoSwiss on Sunday morning.
St Antönien, also in canton Graubünden, reported 64cm and Braunwald in the neighbouring canton of Glarus saw 72cm, the same amount as Unteriberg in canton Schwyz.
The last time so much snow fell in November was in 1952, but what is also unusual about the current weather conditions is that the stormy northwest wind is carrying relatively large amounts of snow down south, for example to the upper Engadine valley.

When you wait a little bit ..wow does the climate (weather) change!

Video Speach Bob Carter

Prof. Robert M. Carter
James Cook University of North Queensland
Science, Engineering & Information Technology
Marine Geophysical Laboratory
Adjunct Research Professor Appointed: 1998
He is a geologist and marine geologist with special interests in stratigraphic and, more recently, climate change.





He is one of many scientists from climate and geological backgrounds who know the facts and history of the natural Climate, and makes a great case against the "Self anointed Consensus-istic" fakes amongst the scientific community

Real Temperature records

I want to put these numbers down again this is the new temperature warmest years for the U.S. These numbers were only revised after the payed off Hansen at Nasa was presented with facts that made it look like he surely made of false temperature numbers to try to show more warming during the last 10 than in the past.
This is the warmest 10 years from record keeping U.S. history.
1.1934
2.1998
3.1921
4.2006
5.1931
6.1999
7.1953
8.1990
9.1938
10.1939
It is noticeable that the 1930's had some warm years then there was a cooling from 1940 to 1970 so we don't see but one year during that period of time that made the top 10 warmest years. According to the pattern of natural warming and cooling we are about to enter the next cooling period. There are certainly many natural variables that blur some definite climate periods including: sunspot activity, clouds, El Nino and La Nina water temperature change and the jet stream, volcanoes to name a few.
Again the Al Goreans claim our pollution is causing climate change. They have made themselves believe that if you throw a piece of paper on the highway that is magically floats up to the upper atmosphere and causes more warming, they are funny. The claims they make don't make sense at all when you know enough about the planet.

Here is a great page with U.S. Hot and Cold records for each state

Real reasons to stop the lies

This is from California State Congressmman Tom McClintock.....
The following is an excerpt from a speech that was delivered to the Western Conservative Political Action Conference on October 12, 2007 in Newport Beach.

Last year, in the name of saving the planet from global warming, California adopted the most radically restrictive legislation anywhere in the nation, including AB 32, which requires a 25 percent reduction in man-made carbon dioxide emissions within 13 years.

To put this in perspective, we could junk every car in the state of California RIGHT NOW – and not meet this mandate.

Californians just approved $40 billion of bonds that California’s political leaders promised would be used for highways, dams, aqueducts and other capital improvements. They are desperately needed.

But at the same time, those same political leaders have imposed a 25 percent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions.

Now here’s the problem. Building highways, dams and aqueducts requires tremendous amounts of concrete, the principle ingredient of which is cement.

How is cement produced? It is produced by taking limestone and super-heating it into a molten state – it comes out the other side as a compound called clinker. Clinker is about 2/3 the weight of the original limestone. The missing 1/3 of that weight is carbon dioxide. And when you include the emissions required to superheat the limestone, it turns out that for every ton of cement, a TON of carbon dioxide is released. It’s the third biggest source of carbon dioxide in all human enterprise.

But now we have a law that specifically forbids us from doing so. That was the essence of the Jerry Brown lawsuits against new highway projects that were part of the summer budget impasse.

Citing AB 32, Brown argued that unless the counties could show how they would build highways without using earthmoving equipment or concrete – and that once built, that people would not drive automobiles on them – the only legal use of the funds would be to promote mass transit, transit villages – and I’m not making this up – pedestrian trails and bicycle paths.

So much for construction.

Agriculture is in big trouble, too.

You can start with nitrogen fertilizer, which is a critical component of all agricultural activity. Unfortunately, it produces large amounts of nitrous oxide, another so-called greenhouse gas that must be radically curtailed in California.

The wine industry is also in for a shock. Fermentation of wine occurs when a molecule of glucose in the grapes is converted into EQUAL PARTS of alcohol and Carbon Dioxide.

But the biggest agricultural impact is the administration’s mandate for heavily subsidized use of ethanol fuel. Ethanol is produced in exactly the same way as the alcohol in wine: the glucose in corn is converted into equal parts of ethyl alcohol and CARBON DIXOIDE.

Following AB 32, the governor’s appointees on the California Air Resources Board imposed a requirement that ALL gasoline sold in California within THREE YEARS, must be comprised of at least TEN PERCENT ethanol, doubling the current mandate.

Now think about this: an acre of corn produces about 350 gallons of ethanol. There are 15 billion gallons of gasoline used in California each year. In order to meet the ten percent requirement in three years, it means converting 4.3 million acres of farmland to ethanol production. Now that’s a lot of farmland, considering that we have a total of 11 million acres producing any kind of crops.

Current ethanol mandates are already producing serious shortages in other parts of the world, as farmland that had been producing food shifts to ethanol to chase hundreds of millions of dollars of government subsidies coming out of your pocket. There were riots in Mexico earlier this year in response to spiraling tortilla prices.

And we’re seeing this across the board – including commodities like milk and beef that are responding to increased prices for corn feed. And as you see your grocery prices rise as a result of this policy, just be glad you’re not in the Third World. Food is a relatively small portion of the family incomes in affluent nations, but they consume more than half of family earnings in third world countries.

So when the global warming alarmists predict worldwide starvation, they’re right. They’re creating it.


Here is a link to the full speech

Polar Bears still happy!

photo © Amanda Byrd.
Polar bears still aren't drowning or dying off like claimed back in 2005 and earlier.
The Amanda Byrd pic which was used for that hoax from the leftist media to get more people sucking up false news about Global Warming is still being used as so many were fooled and still don't know the truth.
I had one gal post that pic alone on another blog just to show her support for the Global Warming side. She had to be so embarrassed when I pointed out the news that she was fooled by the hoax. I felt bad for her, but she wouldn't admit she was fooled by her comrades in the "pseudo media" who deceived her so distastefully. And the fact that this scam has been known for years and the pic was still swirling around with the original hoax story its just hard to clean up such horrid lies.

20/20 John Stossel on Climate Change

This is 20/20 John Stossel on Climate Change

Huricanes come and go and not with climate change

Again one easy thing to debunk with the silly claims by Al Gore's movie... we are not having all them dang hurricanes like he promised. In fact "
Florida State University’s COAPS (Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies) says that hurricane season 2007, which ends November 30th, is looking well below normal, in fact they are calling it “historic inactivity”.
Looks like Al Gore is dead wrong again.

The Story of Oil and where it comes from

The pseudo name for oil fuels should be changed to be appropriate to the actual source of oil. Diatom Fuel would be just fine or Sea-bottom Diatom Fuel.

Read this online booklet that takes you step by step through the process of oil creation

BioFuels Look worse by the day

Below is a writing that explains more problems with biofuels and the un-tested theory that they could put out less C02 than Sea-bottom diatom fuels(formerly known as Fossil fuels)

In two prior Editorials, those of 26 September 2007 and 10 October 2007, we describe two important scientific findings that refute the "creation care" contention of England's Sir John Houghton that "very large growth" in the biofuels industry will be required in taking the moral high-road to help slow CO2-induced global warming. Those findings are that: (1) in order to produce enough biofuels to offset a significant amount of fossil fuel usage, humanity would have to employ a large portion of earth's remaining arable land and freshwater resources, which would result in the driving of innumerable species of plants and animals to extinction due to massive habitat loss, and (2) forestation of the land area needed for biofuel production would likely remove much more carbon from the atmosphere than what would not be put into the air by using biofuels in the place of fossil fuels. Here, we describe yet a third way in which replacing fossil fuels with biofuels may be detrimental to earth's climate and the biosphere.

In an important new paper published on 1 August 2007 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Crutzen et al. (2007) calculate the amount of nitrous oxide (N2O) that would be released to the atmosphere as a result of using nitrogen fertilizer to produce the crops used for biofuels, which analysis, in their words, "only considers the conversion of biomass to biofuel" and "does not take into account the use of fossil fuel on ... farms and for fertilizer and pesticide production." As they describe it, this work revealed that "all past studies have severely underestimated the release rates of N2O to the atmosphere, with great potential impact on climate warming." And why would greater N2O emission rates have a tendency to cause the climate to warm? Because, in their vernacular, N2O "is a 'greenhouse gas' with a 100-year average global warming potential 296 times larger than an equal mass of CO2."

Full story at C02 Science.org

Canada News

Look to the sun
An experiment by Danish scientists offers convincing evidence linking global warming to an increase in cosmic radiation

Ian Douglas Clark
Financial Post
Thursday, October 12, 2006


Since Newton's inadvertent experiment with gravity beneath the apple tree, scientists have constrained their theories of how nature operates with the need for experimental evidence -- replicable measurements and quantifiable data -- as proof. While the evidence may sometimes prove the obvious, it may also completely change the accepted view of fundamental processes. Ptolemy's theory of the Earth-centred solar system involved impossibly intricate gyrations of the sun, moon and planets. Copernicus' celestial measurements and Galileo's telescope provided experimental observations of moons orbiting Jupiter and reversals in planetary motion to prove we have a sun-centred solar system.

The science of global climate change is no different, where a heated debate exists between two theories -- climate warming forced by CO2 from human activities (anthropogenic global warming or AGW) and natural warming by changes in the Sun's activity.

Last week, the Danish National Space Center released the results of an experiment that demonstrates how cosmic rays could influence natural warming. In so doing, it ruptured a bedrock of some in the AWG camp. As put by Eigil Friis-Christensen, director of the Danish National Space Center, "Some said there was no conceivable way in which cosmic rays could influence cloud cover. [Our] experiment now shows how they do so, and should help to put the cosmic-ray connection firmly onto the agenda of international climate research."

For decades now, the 20th-century increase in global temperature has been largely blamed on the rise in CO2 from human activities. And why not, given that CO2 is a greenhouse gas that can trap infrared radiation and warm the atmosphere? The problem is that the rise in CO2 is not enough to account for this temperature rise. To compensate, the AGW theory assumes an amplification by water vapour of two to three times.

Water vapour is the major greenhouse gas in the atmosphere and accounts for as much as 95% of the natural greenhouse warming that keeps the Earth habitable. According to this theory, a minor amount of warming by CO2 triggers a larger increase in water vapour. Computer models incorporate this amplified forcing and extrapolate over the next 100 years to predict temperature increase of 1.5 degrees to 4.5 degreesC. Further extrapolation of climate feedbacks has produced the wild speculations of an overheated planet that have led to the catastrophic predictions of The Day After Tomorrow and An Inconvenient Truth.

Supporting the other side of the debate, there are remarkably strong correlations between measures of past solar activity and global temperature. For example, the coldest periods of the Little Ice Age, some 300 years ago, occurred when no sunspots were observed on the face of the sun. Moreover, the rise in temperature over the past 100 years occurred when the sun increased its output to its highest levels in the past 1,000 years.

The problem in this theory is that radiant heat from the more active sun is not enough to explain the rise in 20th-century temperatures. However, a change in solar activity affects more than the light the sun emits. It also changes the sun's magnetosphere that sweeps out past the Earth and partly shields us from the harmful high-energy cosmic radiation originating from supernovae deep in the Milky Way. The theory is that these cosmic rays affect our climate by ionizing particles and gases in our atmosphere. These ionized molecules act as nucleation points for water droplets and lead to the formation of clouds. Clouds reflect sunlight back into space and have by far the greatest impact on the Earth's energy balance and climate. Changes in solar activity, then, have a second and more potent impact on our climate through changes in the cosmic ray flux and thus on cloudiness.

This brings us to the burden of scientific evidence in the climate debate. Until now, the evidence for both sides has relied essentially upon wiggle-matching -- how well the ups and downs in temperature over time match with the ups and downs of solar activity, or of CO2 in the atmosphere. Until now, both theories lacked experimental evidence.

The Danish discovery has changed this. Researchers led by the Space Centre's Henrik Svensmark published experimental evidence in the proceedings of the prestigious British Royal Society showing that high-energy cosmic rays do have the ability to ionize molecules in our atmosphere and nucleate clouds. Mr. Svensmark's team managed to reproduce the gases and chemistry of the lower atmosphere inside a chamber of seven cubic metres. Into this simulated atmosphere, they fired a beam of charged particles like the high-energy cosmic radiation that manages to penetrate the Earth's magnetic shielding. Their measurements of the charged particles they created and the rates of nucleation match with those required to have a measurable impact on climate. They provide experimental evidence to support the theory.

The Danes are not the only team to have sought experimental evidence for cosmic ray forcing of the climate. University of Ottawa researcher Jan Veizer and colleague Nir Shaviv use geology and meteorites to show a cosmic ray connection with climate over the past 600-million years. The research team at CERN, the EU's foremost centre for high-energy physics, announced last month that their new CLOUD experiments would test the theory of cloud formation by cosmic rays. NASA is also taking the solar connection more seriously. This past spring, two new satellites were launched to collect data on the link between cloud formation and climate. All this activity signals a recognition that the solar-cosmic ray-cloudiness connection must be taken seriously in climate research.

While these Danish experiments provide new evidence to support the theory of solar-forcing of climate change, the CO2 warming theory remains untested and unverified. Beyond wiggle-matching, no experimental evidence has been produced to show that an increase in CO2 can accelerate the water cycle and increase greenhouse warming with water vapour. In fact, ice core evidence from the past shows that it doesn't.

In the natural sciences, if you can't measure it, you can't prove it.

© National Post 2006

War? yes...it has to be called what it is..."terrorism"....Environmentalist must be giddy about their huge bon-fires they created with their do-nothing idealism that left millions of acres of southern California ready for big burning. I can only hear them say quietly to themselves that the people who had houses in these areas had no right to be there and the fires were justice. That is the mindset of hate filled eviro-mentals and why many now say that liberalism is a disease.
We cannot look away from this and we have to begin the real effort of thinning forests to make them pristine and to clear firebreaks to stop uncontrolled burning of desert dry areas like we have seen year after year since 1970 when Enviro-mentals took away all common sense care of the forests and dry brush areas. Now people have died because some dorky bird or rodent was protected by stupidity and hate of man-kind.
These fires this year show the real importance of following through with a bill that was passed years ago to thin forests and make them healthier so these fires cannot burn uncontrollably.

Western Furniture Site

The Old Farmers Almanac uses old sunspot theory to predict weather

The Old Farmers Almanac uses old sunspot theory to predict weather to a 80% accuracy since 1787.

This year's edition, on newsstands Wednesday, predicts a warmer than average winter in much of the country. Believers will look for below-average snowfall, except for a narrow swath extending from northeast Texas to Northern New England.

Using a secret formula based on sunspots, weather patterns and meteorology, the almanac points to a hot summer in most areas, but cool and dry in the upper Midwest. It's also looking for drought prompting water management and wildfire problems in Florida and the western states. Elsewhere, look for more rain than normal.

Established in 1792, the Old Farmer's Almanac is North America's oldest continuously published periodical. The little yellow magazine still comes with the hole in the corner so it can hang in outhouses.


Also they do predict in the next couple years that the big cooling pattern will replace the warming cycle since the 1970's.

Below is a very good article on part of the story of Hansen and may explain how and why he has been bought off by Soros, though he is a "paid by your taxes" employee of NASA who should be trying to service you with the truth and not his own idealogy and big pocket money backers.

"For years, Hansen's group at GISS, as well as other leading climate scientists such as Mann and Briffa (creators of historical temperature reconstructions) have flaunted the rules of science by holding the details of their methodologies and algorithm's secret, making full scrutiny impossible. The best possible outcome of this incident will be if new pressure is brought to bear on these scientists to stop saying "trust me" and open their work to their peers for review. This is particularly important for activities such as Hansen's temperature data base at GISS. While measurement of temperature would seem straight forward, in actual fact the signal to noise ration is really low. Upward "adjustments" and fudge factors added by Hansen to the actual readings dwarf measured temperature increases, such that, for example, most reported warming in the US is actually from these adjustments, not measured increases.
In a week when Newsweek chose to argue that climate skeptics need to shut up, this incident actually proves why two sides are needed for a quality scientific debate. Hansen and his folks missed this Y2K bug because, as a man-made global warming cheerleader, he expected to see temperatures going up rapidly so he did not think to question the data. Mr. Hansen is world-famous, is a friend of luminaries like Al Gore, gets grants in quarter million dollar chunks from various global warming believers ( Soros). All his outlook and his incentives made him want the higher temperatures to be true. It took other people with different hypotheses about climate to see the recent temperature jump for what it was: An error."

Nasa weather Scandal

The claims against anthropogenic global warming skeptics are often the same: they're all shills for big oil or other industry wishing to poke holes in the 'consensus theory' of global warming (which isn't a consensus at all). Under the so-called "politicization of science" program, George Soros' (the favorite fundraiser of many democrats) has reportedly given as much as $720,000 to Hansen to help package his alarmist claims and get them pushed by the mainstream media .

How many people, for instance, know that James Hansen, a man billed as a lonely "NASA whistleblower" standing up to the mighty U.S. government, was really funded by Soros' Open Society Institute , which gave him "legal and media advice"?

That's right, Hansen was packaged for the media by Soros' flagship "philanthropy," by as much as $720,000, most likely under the OSI's "politicization of science" program.


So he got some big paychecks from Soros - but was there a quid pro quo? The evidence certainly indicates as much:

That may have meant that Hansen had media flacks help him get on the evening news to push his agenda and lawyers pressuring officials to let him spout his supposedly "censored" spiel for weeks in the name of advancing the global warming agenda.

Hansen even succeeded, with public pressure from his nightly news performances, in forcing NASA to change its media policies to his advantage. Had Hansen's OSI-funding been known, the public might have viewed the whole production differently. The outcome could have been different.


And, James Hansen is one of those NASA scientists who have control in the keeping and reporting of temperature models and readings, which have been found to be false and many have yet to be corrected. Makes it look more like George Soros bought off James Hansen and other scientists who push the propaganda of man made global warming.

Co2 warming?

I found some graphs that may help you understand this Co2 greenhouse effect.

Ok First this one shows the entire greenhouse gas percentages.



Water vapor the largest and most significant greenhouse gas at 95%



Now we will remove the water vapor and figure just the 5% remaining gases

This is the properties of each gas (heat retention potency)

Co2 with a value of 1 = 72.369% of 5%
Methane with a value of 21 = 7.199% of 5%
Nitrous oxide with a value of 310 = 19.000% 0f 5%
(Other gases with variable values) =1.432% of 5%

Now the percentage of man made sources within the 5% gases






Okay try to follow this
72.359% of 5% = 3.618% is total effect of all Co2 greenhouse gas
Now, of that amount man contributes 3.225% to the total of Co2
so we possibly contribute 0.117% of the "Co2" greenhouse effect

Ok now since we had a possible .06 degree warming over the last 100 years, from 1906 to 2006.(Actually the next 40 year cooling period will equal out the imbalance of
two warming periods and only one cooling period during that 100 years. So we might
actually say it is likely cooling or headed toward an ice age.)
If it be true at all that we had this change .06 degree change we can say actual 0.00702 degree of that amount could be from man's Co2. It is virtually nothing and getting rid of all man made source of Co2 for 0.00702 of degree in temperature change while going into another cooling period means nothing at all.



Water vapor the largest and most significant greenhouse gas at 95%
and 0.001% of all water vapor is manmade
The remaining 5% is
Co2 0.177%,
Methane 0.066%
Nitrous oxide 0.047%
Other gases 0.047%

Western Home decor

Who said it was warmer????

Is the keeper of temperatures telling you the truth or do they even care as long as it goes along with the lie about Global warming... In my area of the country we had the coldest winter in a long time with many days breaking cold records by more then 15 degrees or more that something didnt sound right about it being warmer year. read this lead in to the story then click on the link to go to the page with the whole story....

Oops; 2006 Not "The Hottest Year Ever"
By Bill Steigerwald
FrontPageMagazine.com | June 21, 2007

Remember in January when the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and its good friends in media trumpeted that 2006 was the warmest year on record for the contiguous United States?

NOAA based that finding – which allegedly capped a nine-year warming streak "unprecedented in the historical record" – on the daily temperature data that its National Climatic Data Center gathers from about 1,221 mostly rural weather observation stations around the country.

Few people have ever seen or even heard of these small, simple-but-reliable weather stations, which quietly make up what NOAA calls its United States Historical Climatology Network (USHCN).



Click here for complete story

Propaganda can make you stupid

I heard a news report on how many people are going back to push mowers to mow their lawns. If your lawn is no bigger than your living room this could be a good idea. Of course the news story couldn't get by without be about global warming. They had to include one interview for a lady who has the world by her hand knowing the exact problem in the world she can fix with a push lawn mower she just bought. Her words,"It helps on noise pollution and the ozone." What a smart lady, bet she got that from reading Al Gore's palm. Or maybe she thinks her old gas driven lawn mower was really a freon gas producer. Or most likely she is like most brain dead, easy to fool, sheep type people who dont care about facts or truth but only want to show their "feelings" and that they "care".
What a bunch of crap. She was told so much bullshit she really doesnt know a CFC from a CO2 or an ozone layer from the cloud around her head.
This is what is dangerous about this kind of propaganda and why it has to be fought with the truth. It nakes people stupid. This is exactly how the old USSR kept the power over so many people for so many years. This is exactly the same kind of propaganda used to control the minds of people who had no freedom.

The only inconvient truth is that Al Gore is the liar of the century

Read this small list of the many expert's comments about Al "the Liar" Gore's silly movie

Dr. Chris de Freitas, climate scientist, associate professor, University of Auckland, New Zealand: "I can assure Mr. Gore that no one from the South Pacific islands have fled to New Zealand because of rising seas. In fact, if Gore consults the data, he will see it shows sea level falling in some parts of the Pacific."


Dr. Nils-Axel Mörner, emeritus professor of paleogeophysics & geodynamics, Stockholm University, Sweden: ""We find no alarming sea level rise going on, in the Maldives, Tovalu, Venice, the Persian Gulf and even satellite altimetry if applied properly."


Dr. Paul Reiter, Professor - Institut Pasteur, Unit of Insects and Infectious Diseases, Paris, France, comments on Gore’s belief that Nairobi and Harare were founded just above the mosquito line to avoid malaria and how the mosquitoes are now moving to higher altitudes: "Gore is completely wrong here - malaria has been documented at an altitude 2500 m - Nairobi and Harare are at altitudes of about 1500 m. The new altitudes of malaria are lower than those recorded 100 years ago. None of the "30 so called new diseases"" Gore references are attributable to global warming, none."


Dr. Mitchell Taylor, Manager, Wildlife Research Section, Department of Environment, Igloolik, Nunavut, Canada: "Our information is that 7 of 13 populations of polar bears in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (more than half the world’s estimated total) are either stable, or increasing …. Of the three that appear to be declining, only one has been shown to be affected by climate change. No one can say with certainty that climate change has not affected these other populations, but it is also true that we have no information to suggest that it has."


Dr. Petr Chylek, adjunct professor, Dept. of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: "Mr. Gore suggests that Greenland melt area increased considerably between 1992 and 2005. But 1992 was exceptionally cold in Greenland and the melt area of ice sheet was exceptionally low due to the cooling caused by volcanic dust emitted from Mt. Pinatubo. If, instead of 1992, Gore had chosen for comparison the year 1991, one in which the melt area was 1% higher than in 2005, he would have to conclude that the ice sheet melt area is shrinking and that perhaps a new ice age is just around the corner."


Dr. Gary D. Sharp, Center for Climate/Ocean Resources Study, Salinas, California: ""The oceans are now heading into one of their periodic phases of cooling. … Modest changes in temperature are not about to wipe them [coral] out. Neither will increased carbon dioxide, which is a fundamental chemical building block that allows coral reefs to exist at all."


Dr. R. M. Carter, professor, Marine Geophysical Laboratory, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia: "Both the Antarctic and Greenland ice caps are thickening. The temperature at the South Pole has declined by more than 1 degree C since 1950. And the area of sea-ice around the continent has increased over the last 20 years."


Dr./Cdr. M. R. Morgan, FRMS, formerly advisor to the World Meteorological Organization/climatology research scientist at University of Exeter, U.K.: "From data published by the Canadian Ice Service there has been no precipitous drop off in the amount or thickness of the ice cap since 1970 when reliable over-all coverage became available for the Canadian Arctic."


Rob Scagel, M.Sc., forest microclimate specialist, Pacific Phytometric Consultants, Surrey, British Colombia, Canada comments on Gore’’s belief that the Mountain Pine Beetle (MPB) is an "invasive exotic species" that has become a plague due to fewer days of frost: "The MPB is a species native to this part of North America and is always present. The MPB epidemic started as comparatively small outbreaks and through forest management inaction got completely out of hand."

Compiled by Tom Harris, Natural Resources Stewardship Project, 7 Nov 06

Computer Models generated to prove what???

Did you ever hear a Global Warming Theory Scientist who used climate model info to make his theory sound like he knows facts? Did he ever mention that within that model showing 1000 years of warming that we would have a natural ice age that would cool down the earth? Do they ever estimate the next ice age within their models to prove global warming? Or is it that they forget to model ice ages into their imaginary models of temperature figures that somehow prove that the earth has had static temps forever. And now only the power of man can control the climate by his behavior or existence.

South Africa Freezes

In just a few days 54 cold temp records in South Africa were put in hell to freeze over liars of Global Warming who call plain old weather like hurricanes and weekly warming or cooling over the planet a climate change. Daily the real God makes them look like the lying fools they are... unfortunately 21 died in the freezing temps that came completely unexpected, and maybe more so, since Al Gore and the world team of dumb asses have made so many people think they will have more and more heat. I am just sure more people these days who have fallen for this crap don't plan or think of what to do if extremely cold weather hits them overnight.
OK, this is one just another notable weather event that you think I am claiming is the next ice age coming. No, don't jump to that conclusion, yet. But rest assured that some freak of the Global Warming band wagon WILL take this event and put it in their claims of Global Warming.... the word DUH!! was made up just for this ..CLIMATE CHANGES!!! It does it no matter what man does or doesn't do. And you and everyone else who has seen any part of this planet knows it has a history of change that came before mankind or Big Oil or planes or hairspray or your lawn mower.
Man does not change the weather or the climate and the weather or the climate could take mankind off this planet any time it wants to.
We've been so lucky to have lived during a time of very mild weather and it is bound to change to another Ice Age within a few hundred years. No one can say exactly when. But it will and that's the truth.

They are coming to take your "way of life"

You don't believe that Global Warming is the tool of new Communism?
They are coming after your life BIG TIME!!
It was just a joke last year when one dumb-ass congressman tried to pass a bill to regulate lawn mowing... it didn't pass.
But all they had to do was take it to the EPA and now we hear the EPA is taking the job to attack you as a criminal who uses a fossil fuel burning, smog machine that plows down that rain forest in your yard. YOU WILL PAY !!!
And now you think its funny that some mentally-warped politi-celeb Sheryl Crow said you have to cut your use of TOILET PAPER to stop Global warming???????? She might say she was joking about just using one tiny piece, but that idea alone will start the tax-aholics on their mission to make her silly comment come true.
So they may not put the TP police in each of our bathrooms to make sure we don't use more than one small square each time we use it. They may not put cameras in your bathroom and pay welfare moms to watch all the screens to catch ya cheating on your TP use. But you bet they will put Global Warming taxes on anything you use today. That is their plan!!! And its coming on fast because NO ONE with enough power can get the truth out...and get people to care enough to stop this in it's tracks. We will pay trillions of our hard earned dollars for nothing but some hot air from some sick leftist wackos who came up with this whole scam and the propaganda behind it.... NOT ONE SINGLE THING CAN BE PROVED THAT MAN HAS DONE ONE THING TO CAUSE THE LESS THAN SINGLE DEGREE OF WARMING IN THE LAST 100 YEARS.
They have fossils from life that roamed Antarctica millions of years ago... THE CLIMATE HAS CHANGED IN NATURE FOR BILLIONS OF YEARS AND MAN DID NOTHING ALL THAT TIME. NOW???? NOW ONLY MAN CAN CHANGE THE CLIMATE BY USING A HAND FULL OF RECYCLED, BLEACHED, WOOD PULP TO WIPE HIS ASS?
THIS IS GETTING MORE INSANE EACH DAY AND YET YOU STILL HEAR THE DUMB ASS MEDIA PUSH A SMALL CHANGE IN WEATHER AS GLOBAL WARMING... YOU STILL HEAR RETARDED, PSEUDO EXPERTS TELL YOU THAT COLD WEATHER RECORDS ARE THE SAME AS WARM DAYS...THAT IT IS ALL GLOBAL WARMING ...WAKE UP YOUR FRIENDS... THIS MATTERS OR THEY WOULDN'T BE SPENDING SO MUCH TIME TRYING TO MAKE YOU BELIEVE THIS LIE!!!!