Ice Age is Coming

Just when it seemed 'Algore' was out......

2011-06-22T09:14:00.000-07:00

'Algore' speaks out again on his imaginary global warming and his idea of controlling the bodies of women to stop them from creating more people. He twists thru explanation of teaching women to stop having kids... if you listen carefully you will see thru his rhetoric. He, like all "GW" followers and greenies just hate people in general and want all resources to themselves.
Mind you, they don't follow a word of what they tell you to do. Remember Algore's big electric sucking house?

Watch him squirm thru this interview:

New Mini Ice Age just around the corner

2011-06-16T13:13:00.000-07:00

Well, well, well,
Sunspot activity isn't going the way of the "Global Warming Wonks" it seems they will have to change all their "bull" to new "bull" by trying to claim CO2 will cause "Global Cooling"
An announcement on June 14th 2011 from scientists at the US National Solar Observatory (NSO) and US Air Force Research Laboratory. "Three different analyses of the Sun's recent behavior all indicate that a period of unusually low solar activity may be about to begin".

Sunspot activity is certainly the most powerful climate changer. Man just cannot compete with this even if we tried. Warming periods happen no matter what man does and cooling happens no matter what man does. There just is no science and never has been a drop of it that can prove man can do anything to change the climate. Why so many were fooled by the claims from those who needed a way to take more power away from all free humans, just blows my mind. I saw it clearly the very first time I heard the word "Global Warming" used by a so called news reporter who was using it in a story about some local environmental pollution. It made no sense to me that the word was used in that context and I knew right then it was a term of propaganda and that is exactly what it became.
As far as history tells us this inactivity of sunspots will cause some amount of cooling.... I also want to remind you... we will be into the normal cooling period of 30 to 40 years. 1900-1940 was warmer, 1940-1980 was cooler, 1980-2010/2015 was warmer ...I believe we started the cooling early, but even if we use the 2015-2050 number that would overlap the mini ice age years it should prove to be colder over many of the years up to 2050 and beyond.

As NASA notes:
Early records of sunspots indicate that the Sun went through a period of inactivity in the late 17th century. Very few sunspots were seen on the Sun from about 1645 to 1715. Although the observations were not as extensive as in later years, the Sun was in fact well observed during this time and this lack of sunspots is well documented. This period of solar inactivity also corresponds to a climatic period called the "Little Ice Age" when rivers that are normally ice-free froze and snow fields remained year-round at lower altitudes. There is evidence that the Sun has had similar periods of inactivity in the more distant past.

Startling insights on climate, weather, and the politics of climate change

2010-10-06T16:59:00.000-07:00

An audio must that explains facts of historical climate change. And the complexity of natural systems and why the hoax of Global Warming came about in the first place. And why those who have pushed the pseudo claims based on computer models of man-made Co2 warming have nothing factual to base their theory on. Please listen.

Startling insights on climate, weather, and the politics of climate change (scroll down the page to the audio bar to listen to this interview)

Why this country will go broke with a hoax!

2010-10-05T21:58:00.000-07:00

Let me explain simply , this is taxpayer's gov't science money going to a "Play" production literally propaganda on Climate Change.

"The National Science Foundation (NSF) is “an independent federal agency created by Congress in 1950 ‘to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense.’” It can now add “fund plays on climate change” to that list.

The New York Times reports that the federal agency will award $700,000 of taxpayer money to a New York theater company to produce a show on climate change. Titled, “The Great Immensity,” the production will explore “the emotional and psychological aspects of the current environmental crisis.”

Click here for the whole story

They say Liberalism is a disease, here's one reason why

2010-10-05T21:39:00.000-07:00

Emails from "Hoax Science" should be top news

2009-11-28T15:30:00.000-08:00

This scandal will be hushed by the leftist media and they will try to say its nothing, since we will be 30 degrees hotter by 2050, or some equally ridicules claim. As we head into the next cooling period of 30 to 40 years we have already seen them change from " Co2 Global Warming" to "Climate Change" or shall we say "Co2 Global Cooling"?? It has been a hoax and will always be so, as they try to conquer the world with a new tax system. It's not just getting better gas mileage it's getting more money in the pockets of the Leftist Politicians to make the whole world one Marxist Entity.

Here's one sample of the deceivers emails within the many files that have been exposed.

From: Phil Jones
To: ray bradley ,mann*******, mhughes*******
Subject: Diagram for WMO Statement
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:31:15 +0000
Cc: k.briffa@xxx.xx.xx,t.osborn@xxxx.xxx

Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,
Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later today or
first thing tomorrow.
I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps
to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from
1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline. Mike’s series got the annual
land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land
N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999
for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with
data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.
Thanks for the comments, Ray.
Cheers
Phil
Prof. Phil Jones
Climatic Research Unit Telephone *****
School of Environmental Sciences Fax *****
University of East Anglia
Norwich Email p.**********
NR4 7TJ
UK
Read more at the link below:
View More At WattsUpWithThat.Com

C02 build up? ...dont think so

2008-09-12T20:35:00.000-07:00

AFTER TWO LARGE ANNUAL GAINS, RATE OF ATMOSPHERIC CO2 INCREASE
RETURNS TO AVERAGE, NOAA REPORTS

March 31, 2005 ... A spike in the amount of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere between 2001 and 2003 appears to be a temporary phenomenon and apparently does not indicate a quickening build-up of the gas in the atmosphere, according to an analysis by NOAA climate experts.

Just another fact that doesnt add up to claims.

Czech President Václav Klaus speaks out against the lie...

2008-05-28T13:54:00.000-07:00

This is one real leader who knows how oppresive socialism can be shoved into the minds of the "people" as their freedoms are pick-pocketed from the back of their trousers...

Václav Klaus, Chatham House, London, 7 November 2007

..."Nevertheless, there is another threat on the horizon. I see this threat in environmentalism which is becoming a new dominant ideology, if not a religion. Its main weapon is raising the alarm and predicting the human life endangering climate change based on man-made global warming. The recent awarding of Nobel Prize to the main apostle of this hypothesis was the last straw because by this these ideas were elevated to the pedestal of “holy and sacred” uncriticisable truths.

It became politically correct to caricature us, who dare to speak about it, as those who are talking about things they do not understand and are not experts on. This criticism is inappropriate. People like me do not have ambitions to enter the field of climatology. They do not try to better measure global temperature or to present alternative scenarios of the future global climate fluctuations.

They need not do it because the climate change debate is basically not about science; it is about ideology. It is not about global temperature; it is about the concept of human society. It is not about scientific ecology; it is about environmentalism, which is a new anti-individualistic, pseudo-collectivistic ideology based on putting nature and environment and their supposed protection and preservation before and above freedom. That’s one of the reasons why my recently published book on this topic has a subtitle: “What is Endangered, Climate or Freedom?”.

When we look at it in a proper historical perspective, the issue is – once again – freedom and its enemies. Those of us who feel very strongly about it can never accept

- the irrationality with which the current world has embraced the climate change (or global warming) as a real danger to the future of mankind, as well as

- the irrationality of proposed and partly already implemented etatist and dirigistic measures because they will fatally endanger our freedom and prosperity, the two goals we consider – I do believe – our priorities.

My position can be summarized in the following way:

1. Contrary to the currently prevailing views – promoted by global warming alarmists, by Al Gore’s preaching, by the IPCC, or by the Stern Report – the increase in global temperatures in the last years, decades and centuries has been very small and because of its size practically negligible in its actual impact upon human beings and their activities. For most of the Earth’s history (95% of it), the globe has been warmer than it has been for the last 200 years. In addition to it, using history again, it has been proved that the consequences of modest warming have been mostly positive, not negative.

2. The arguments of global warming alarmists rely exclusively upon very speculative forecasts, not upon serious analysis and extrapolation of past trends or upon undeniable conclusions of natural sciences. The available empirical evidence is not alarming. The highly publicized forecasts made by some leading environmentalists are based on experimental simulations of very complicated forecasting models that have not been found very reliable when explaining past developments. They were mostly done by software engineers, not by scientists themselves.

3. The debate has its important scientific side connected with the dispute whether the current mild warming is man-made or natural. Let’s listen to the scientists but one thing is and becomes evident more and more: the scientific dispute about the causes of recent climate changes continues. The attempts to proclaim a scientific consensus are self-debilitating. There is none. More and more scientists, on the contrary, dare to speak out about it.

4. The issue has an important economic aspect which requires the application of a standard cost–benefit analysis. A rational response to any danger depends on the size and probability of the eventual risk and on the magnitude of the costs of its avoidance. I feel obliged to say that – based on my knowledge – I find the risk too small and the costs of eliminating it too high. The application of the so-called “precautionary principle,” advocated by the environmentalists, is – conceptually – a wrong strategy, because human civilization cannot exist in a regime of the precautionary principle.

5. The deindustrialization and similar restrictive policies will be of no help. Instead of blocking economic growth, the increase of wealth all over the world and fast technical progress – all connected with freedom and free markets – we should leave them to proceed unhampered. They represent the solution to any eventual climate changes, not their cause. We should trust in the rationality of men. We should never forget that the government failure is always much bigger than the market failure. We should not believe more in Al Gore than in the omnipotence of the Soviet or Czechoslovak central planners. Fifty- or hundred-year plans of the current environmentalists will not be any better than the five-year plans which liquidated the economic freedom (and the economic efficiency connected with it) in the centrally planned economies of the past.

6. The global warming issue has a very important North-South and West-East aspect as well. Environmental quality is a luxury good and demand for it increases with income and wealth. The developed countries had to go along the path of the environmental Kuznets curve in the past and do not have any right to prematurely impose their current overambitious environmental standards upon less developed countries, because that would lead to an economic disaster there.

The only conclusion is that no radical measures are necessary. Famous Czech writer of the early 20th century Jaroslav Hašek, whose book “The Good Soldier Schweik” is known world-wide, made a point with saying: “To chce klid”. The Englishmen would probably say “Take it easy”.

I lived most of my life in an oppressive and very unproductive political, economic and social system called communism. It was impossible to “take it easy”. Now I live in a system based on the ideology of Europeism which prefers supranational institutions with their post-democracy to the good old democratic institutions in a well-defined constitutional sovereign state. It is difficult to “take it easy” again. And we are moving – very rapidly – to the era of environmentalism in which environment (or perhaps the irrational claims of environmentalists) is placed ahead of men and their freedom. We can take the global climate changes easy, but the climate propaganda and new wave of dangerous indoctrination of the whole world not."

Winners announced in 'The Sky's Not Falling' video-essay contest

2008-04-30T00:39:00.000-07:00

"The Sky's Not Falling" video/essay contest, sponsored by WND Books, formerly World Ahead Media.

Kid's go after the truth and explain false claims by the Global Warming Alarmists in essay video contest.

Second Place :

First Place:

Record Snow in Anchorage

2008-04-27T22:16:00.000-07:00

Photo Credit: Anchorage Daily News
Yeah its Alaska but still was spring...and few days was 50F and seemed like spring and t-shirt weather, but with no global warming as God teaches Al Gore who's boss ....two feet of fresh snow smacked Algorians in the face.

"Before Friday, the most snow that had ever fallen in one day after April 1 was 8.3 inches. The day’s official tally at the airport: 15.5."
Read the whole story here:
http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story/388142.html

Western Furniture

Now cooling is cooling

2008-04-26T07:01:00.000-07:00

Wait it's into Spring here here and we got cold and snow like it was in February ! Can someone say Climate Change ...yes Climate Change is now the word to replace Global Warming dialog.... that's because the thinkers who made up the silly warming claims now see the cooling coming and have to change you all to believe that the same manmade junk that caused the so-called warming... now causes the cooling ...
So C02 really causes cooling now? They just took 20 years brainwashing you to believe it causes the warming....

This graph shows last years major cooling drop (blue) and that one year drop has never been seen as so radical in either direction
But before you freak and say ..yikes we are in the Ice Age now.... just wait... all the warming we had from 1900 was only .6C and last years drop was about .6C

The Real Consensus

2008-04-23T06:33:00.000-07:00

There is no such thing as consensus on man made Global Warming and more scientists do not follow the "Sky is Falling" side.
This link is a complied list that makes the IPCC look like a near empty ant farm of non scientist Greenies from political agenda based organizations

http://www.oism.org/pproject/

Proof, that Believing in Global Warming makes you stupid

2008-04-03T17:15:00.000-07:00

Ted Turner knows alot about the Marxist Agenda, at least he thinks he does....well he had a good teacher while married to Marxist Jane Fonda.

"Failure to address global warming will have us all dead or eating each other by mid-century." Says Ted Turner, the restaurateur, former media mogul and wacko environmentalist whose controversial comments have earned him the nickname "Mouth of the South."

He says "We'll be eight degrees hotter in 10 , not 10 but....in 30 or 40 years and basically none of the crops will grow,"

"Most of the people will have died and the rest of us will be cannibals," says Turner, 69. "Civilization will have broken down. The few people left will be living in a failed state — like Somalia or Sudan — and living conditions will be intolerable."
"....there will be droughts, we wont be growing corn..."
One way to combat global warming, Turner said, is to stabilize the population.

"We're too many people; that's why we have global warming," he said. "Too many people are using too much stuff."

Turner suggested that "on a voluntary basis, everybody in the world's got to pledge to themselves that one or two children is it."

Admitting that he's "always suffered from foot-in-the-mouth disease," Turner added, "I've gotten a lot better, though. It's been a long time since anybody caught me saying something stupid."

***I guess he couldn't wait any longer to get back on the stupidness wagon... it's so funny to have guys like this on the Global Warming Alarmists side.

See you have to look at the common sense realities in his statement... Mr. Foot-in-the-Mouth here says we will all die off , then he says we have to all die off to save the planet from all of us dying off. I cant help but laugh at stupidity . If we start dying off then we wont have the problem anyway , so we shouldnt do anything if Global warming was really happening as it would even out the problems the dummies say we have. I am laughing still... this is so funny... and so many people believe this insanity the aliens must be laughing their big black eyes out over this whole dumb hoax of man made global warming.

Check Western Furniture

The Artic is grimly dying ! tears , tears

2008-04-02T18:24:00.000-07:00

Oh yeah the Artic only melts when MAN is driving cars all over.... yeah right... how about back in time?

Roald Amundsen, a Norwegian explorer, successfully navigated the Northwest Passage on August 26, 1905. (Meaning that this Passage was clear enough of ice for a wooden sailboat, with a crew of seven, to successfully navigate it more than 100 years ago.)

This Passage was also conquered several times in the 1940s. The St. Roch - built for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Force to serve as a supply ship - navigated the Northwest Passage in 1942, the second ship to make the passage, and the first to travel the passage from west to east. In 1944, St. Roch returned to Vancouver via the more northerly route of the Northwest Passage, making her run in 86 days. The epic voyages of St. Roch demonstrated Canadian sovereignty in the Arctic during the difficult wartime years, and extended Canadian control over its vast northern territories.

"When you consider that serious monitoring of Arctic ice levels only started in 1972, and that explorers successfully navigated these seas in relatively archaic ships 60 and 100 years ago, how can anybody honestly claim that today's conditions in this region are in any way unprecedented, historic, or grim?

The whole Story from Newsbusters

Baby Tyrannosaurus rex discovered in the African Congo

2008-04-01T23:05:00.000-07:00

Oh yeah! April Fools ......also ... Global warming is April fools and May fools and June fools and July fools and August fools and September fools ...on so on...

Fine Art Watercolor Gallery

warmest year search

2008-03-28T23:08:00.000-07:00

Its no wonder so many are ignorant about the climate and real temperatures.
With one search on Google you get these:

* 2007 to Be Warmest Year on Record, Forecasters Say.....
* 2006 Was Warmest Year Yet Recorded for U.S........
* NASA - 2005 Warmest Year in Over a Century.......
* 2005 warmest year on record - Environment- msnbc.com

None of the top headings are factual
1934 was the warmest year recorded. 1998 was next. 2007 was the coolest one year drop in temperature that is the single fastest temperature change ever recorded, either up or down. And the winter of 2008 is coldest since 2001.

Luckily you get one fact that tells more of the story: Nasa'a correction on temperature readings.

NASA's Backtrack on Warmest Year Is Being Ignored, Critic Says ...Aug 16, 2007 ... (CNSNews.com) - NASA scientists this month corrected an error that resulted in 1934 replacing 1998 as the warmest year on record in the U.S. ...

Cooling Cooling Cooling is Cool is not warming!

2008-02-27T20:04:00.000-08:00

Hahaha It just isnt enough to say the cooling is on us to make Algore the nut a crushed nut. He went out saying C02 causes warming... now he will have to say C02 makes cooling the planet... hope you remember the change of his brain.
Ok, I dont think C02 causes cooling either but it doesnt do enough to cause warming either. So now we will be colder as so many scientists have said for a few years as political fake scientists kept saying the planet is warming.
We have to check real temps and facts to know things..and not listen to fake political leftist people who think they can brainwash us. Thats all it is. The earth is smarter then leftists , thats why they look it as their God.
Now you can read the news about the 1 degree cooler earth in just one year. The truth is that is a record of change. After 100 years of back and forth of cooling and warming... now we are headed into the next cooling... no matter what man does. The earth decided to do it. AND that wont change unless the universe or the sun says it will change again. The real God must have known great ways to change the climate and its all here in this earth. So many natural things changed the earths climate. Man is useless for any changing of the big earth climate PERIOD!

Check out the whole story on the cooler earth

Pacific Decadal Oscillation

2007-11-22T11:32:00.000-08:00

The "Pacific Decadal Oscillation" (PDO) is a long-lived El Niño-like pattern of Pacific climate variability.

( It's very funny that the climate changes over the last 120 years fit somewhat closely with the pattern of the PDO. And man is creating the climate change??
Though the PDO cannot explain all the changes from year to year weather, it is but one of so many natural occurrences that are part of the big picture of global climate change that dwarfs any effect man-made greenhouse gases.
Brrrrr its cold today!)

Several independent studies find evidence for just two full PDO cycles in the past century: "cool" PDO regimes prevailed from 1890-1924 and again from 1947-1976, while "warm" PDO regimes dominated from 1925-1946 and from 1977 through (at least) the mid-1990's. Shoshiro Minobe has shown that 20th century PDO fluctuations were most energetic in two general periodicities, one from 15-to-25 years, and the other from 50-to-70 years.

As Usual

2007-11-19T12:06:00.000-08:00

Earlier in the year..... wow burning hot !!! (be sure to read the "related story" titles)
February 24, 2007 - 6:54 PM
Winter in Switzerland is warmest on record

::Related stories Swiss Re signs climate change pact
Taking the temperature of ski resorts
Swiss hope to benefit from EU car emission cap
UN panel issues tough climate change verdict ::

Temperatures have been three degrees Celsius higher than average over the past three months, in what has been the warmest winter since measurements began 140 years ago.

Oops spoke too soon, later this year:

November 12, 2007 - 11:59 AM
Snowiest start to winter in 55 years

::Related stories:Winter in Switzerland is warmest on record
Tourist industry faces climate dilemma
Snow future for alpine tourism? ::

Up to 120 centimetres of snow has fallen on the Swiss Alps since Friday, the largest amount at the start of winter for over five decades – and more is expected.
Tourism authorities in ski resorts are rubbing their hands, not only because of the low temperatures but also in expectation of a record season.
The southeastern resort of Davos in eastern Switzerland, which lies at 1,560m, saw 62cm of snow fall within 24 hours, according to the national weather service MeteoSwiss on Sunday morning.
St Antönien, also in canton Graubünden, reported 64cm and Braunwald in the neighbouring canton of Glarus saw 72cm, the same amount as Unteriberg in canton Schwyz.
The last time so much snow fell in November was in 1952, but what is also unusual about the current weather conditions is that the stormy northwest wind is carrying relatively large amounts of snow down south, for example to the upper Engadine valley.

When you wait a little bit ..wow does the climate (weather) change!

Video Speach Bob Carter

2007-11-10T09:03:00.000-08:00

Prof. Robert M. Carter
James Cook University of North Queensland
Science, Engineering & Information Technology
Marine Geophysical Laboratory
Adjunct Research Professor Appointed: 1998
He is a geologist and marine geologist with special interests in stratigraphic and, more recently, climate change.

He is one of many scientists from climate and geological backgrounds who know the facts and history of the natural Climate, and makes a great case against the "Self anointed Consensus-istic" fakes amongst the scientific community

Real Temperature records

2007-11-05T23:10:00.000-08:00

I want to put these numbers down again this is the new temperature warmest years for the U.S. These numbers were only revised after the payed off Hansen at Nasa was presented with facts that made it look like he surely made of false temperature numbers to try to show more warming during the last 10 than in the past.
This is the warmest 10 years from record keeping U.S. history.
1.1934
2.1998
3.1921
4.2006
5.1931
6.1999
7.1953
8.1990
9.1938
10.1939
It is noticeable that the 1930's had some warm years then there was a cooling from 1940 to 1970 so we don't see but one year during that period of time that made the top 10 warmest years. According to the pattern of natural warming and cooling we are about to enter the next cooling period. There are certainly many natural variables that blur some definite climate periods including: sunspot activity, clouds, El Nino and La Nina water temperature change and the jet stream, volcanoes to name a few.
Again the Al Goreans claim our pollution is causing climate change. They have made themselves believe that if you throw a piece of paper on the highway that is magically floats up to the upper atmosphere and causes more warming, they are funny. The claims they make don't make sense at all when you know enough about the planet.

Here is a great page with U.S. Hot and Cold records for each state

Real reasons to stop the lies

2007-11-02T04:45:00.000-07:00

This is from California State Congressmman Tom McClintock.....
The following is an excerpt from a speech that was delivered to the Western Conservative Political Action Conference on October 12, 2007 in Newport Beach.

Last year, in the name of saving the planet from global warming, California adopted the most radically restrictive legislation anywhere in the nation, including AB 32, which requires a 25 percent reduction in man-made carbon dioxide emissions within 13 years.

To put this in perspective, we could junk every car in the state of California RIGHT NOW – and not meet this mandate.

Californians just approved $40 billion of bonds that California’s political leaders promised would be used for highways, dams, aqueducts and other capital improvements. They are desperately needed.

But at the same time, those same political leaders have imposed a 25 percent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions.

Now here’s the problem. Building highways, dams and aqueducts requires tremendous amounts of concrete, the principle ingredient of which is cement.

How is cement produced? It is produced by taking limestone and super-heating it into a molten state – it comes out the other side as a compound called clinker. Clinker is about 2/3 the weight of the original limestone. The missing 1/3 of that weight is carbon dioxide. And when you include the emissions required to superheat the limestone, it turns out that for every ton of cement, a TON of carbon dioxide is released. It’s the third biggest source of carbon dioxide in all human enterprise.

But now we have a law that specifically forbids us from doing so. That was the essence of the Jerry Brown lawsuits against new highway projects that were part of the summer budget impasse.

Citing AB 32, Brown argued that unless the counties could show how they would build highways without using earthmoving equipment or concrete – and that once built, that people would not drive automobiles on them – the only legal use of the funds would be to promote mass transit, transit villages – and I’m not making this up – pedestrian trails and bicycle paths.

So much for construction.

Agriculture is in big trouble, too.

You can start with nitrogen fertilizer, which is a critical component of all agricultural activity. Unfortunately, it produces large amounts of nitrous oxide, another so-called greenhouse gas that must be radically curtailed in California.

The wine industry is also in for a shock. Fermentation of wine occurs when a molecule of glucose in the grapes is converted into EQUAL PARTS of alcohol and Carbon Dioxide.

But the biggest agricultural impact is the administration’s mandate for heavily subsidized use of ethanol fuel. Ethanol is produced in exactly the same way as the alcohol in wine: the glucose in corn is converted into equal parts of ethyl alcohol and CARBON DIXOIDE.

Following AB 32, the governor’s appointees on the California Air Resources Board imposed a requirement that ALL gasoline sold in California within THREE YEARS, must be comprised of at least TEN PERCENT ethanol, doubling the current mandate.

Now think about this: an acre of corn produces about 350 gallons of ethanol. There are 15 billion gallons of gasoline used in California each year. In order to meet the ten percent requirement in three years, it means converting 4.3 million acres of farmland to ethanol production. Now that’s a lot of farmland, considering that we have a total of 11 million acres producing any kind of crops.

Current ethanol mandates are already producing serious shortages in other parts of the world, as farmland that had been producing food shifts to ethanol to chase hundreds of millions of dollars of government subsidies coming out of your pocket. There were riots in Mexico earlier this year in response to spiraling tortilla prices.

And we’re seeing this across the board – including commodities like milk and beef that are responding to increased prices for corn feed. And as you see your grocery prices rise as a result of this policy, just be glad you’re not in the Third World. Food is a relatively small portion of the family incomes in affluent nations, but they consume more than half of family earnings in third world countries.

So when the global warming alarmists predict worldwide starvation, they’re right. They’re creating it.

Here is a link to the full speech

Polar Bears still happy!

2007-10-31T03:28:00.000-07:00

photo © Amanda Byrd.
Polar bears still aren't drowning or dying off like claimed back in 2005 and earlier.
The Amanda Byrd pic which was used for that hoax from the leftist media to get more people sucking up false news about Global Warming is still being used as so many were fooled and still don't know the truth.
I had one gal post that pic alone on another blog just to show her support for the Global Warming side. She had to be so embarrassed when I pointed out the news that she was fooled by the hoax. I felt bad for her, but she wouldn't admit she was fooled by her comrades in the "pseudo media" who deceived her so distastefully. And the fact that this scam has been known for years and the pic was still swirling around with the original hoax story its just hard to clean up such horrid lies.

20/20 John Stossel on Climate Change

2007-10-27T03:32:00.000-07:00

This is 20/20 John Stossel on Climate Change

Huricanes come and go and not with climate change

2007-10-27T03:27:00.000-07:00

Again one easy thing to debunk with the silly claims by Al Gore's movie... we are not having all them dang hurricanes like he promised. In fact "
Florida State University’s COAPS (Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies) says that hurricane season 2007, which ends November 30th, is looking well below normal, in fact they are calling it “historic inactivity”.
Looks like Al Gore is dead wrong again.

The Story of Oil and where it comes from

2007-10-27T03:09:00.000-07:00

The pseudo name for oil fuels should be changed to be appropriate to the actual source of oil. Diatom Fuel would be just fine or Sea-bottom Diatom Fuel.

Read this online booklet that takes you step by step through the process of oil creation

BioFuels Look worse by the day

2007-10-27T02:54:00.000-07:00

Below is a writing that explains more problems with biofuels and the un-tested theory that they could put out less C02 than Sea-bottom diatom fuels(formerly known as Fossil fuels)

In two prior Editorials, those of 26 September 2007 and 10 October 2007, we describe two important scientific findings that refute the "creation care" contention of England's Sir John Houghton that "very large growth" in the biofuels industry will be required in taking the moral high-road to help slow CO2-induced global warming. Those findings are that: (1) in order to produce enough biofuels to offset a significant amount of fossil fuel usage, humanity would have to employ a large portion of earth's remaining arable land and freshwater resources, which would result in the driving of innumerable species of plants and animals to extinction due to massive habitat loss, and (2) forestation of the land area needed for biofuel production would likely remove much more carbon from the atmosphere than what would not be put into the air by using biofuels in the place of fossil fuels. Here, we describe yet a third way in which replacing fossil fuels with biofuels may be detrimental to earth's climate and the biosphere.

In an important new paper published on 1 August 2007 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Crutzen et al. (2007) calculate the amount of nitrous oxide (N2O) that would be released to the atmosphere as a result of using nitrogen fertilizer to produce the crops used for biofuels, which analysis, in their words, "only considers the conversion of biomass to biofuel" and "does not take into account the use of fossil fuel on ... farms and for fertilizer and pesticide production." As they describe it, this work revealed that "all past studies have severely underestimated the release rates of N2O to the atmosphere, with great potential impact on climate warming." And why would greater N2O emission rates have a tendency to cause the climate to warm? Because, in their vernacular, N2O "is a 'greenhouse gas' with a 100-year average global warming potential 296 times larger than an equal mass of CO2."

Full story at C02 Science.org

2007-10-27T02:46:00.000-07:00

Canada News

Look to the sun
An experiment by Danish scientists offers convincing evidence linking global warming to an increase in cosmic radiation

Ian Douglas Clark
Financial Post
Thursday, October 12, 2006

Since Newton's inadvertent experiment with gravity beneath the apple tree, scientists have constrained their theories of how nature operates with the need for experimental evidence -- replicable measurements and quantifiable data -- as proof. While the evidence may sometimes prove the obvious, it may also completely change the accepted view of fundamental processes. Ptolemy's theory of the Earth-centred solar system involved impossibly intricate gyrations of the sun, moon and planets. Copernicus' celestial measurements and Galileo's telescope provided experimental observations of moons orbiting Jupiter and reversals in planetary motion to prove we have a sun-centred solar system.

The science of global climate change is no different, where a heated debate exists between two theories -- climate warming forced by CO2 from human activities (anthropogenic global warming or AGW) and natural warming by changes in the Sun's activity.

Last week, the Danish National Space Center released the results of an experiment that demonstrates how cosmic rays could influence natural warming. In so doing, it ruptured a bedrock of some in the AWG camp. As put by Eigil Friis-Christensen, director of the Danish National Space Center, "Some said there was no conceivable way in which cosmic rays could influence cloud cover. [Our] experiment now shows how they do so, and should help to put the cosmic-ray connection firmly onto the agenda of international climate research."

For decades now, the 20th-century increase in global temperature has been largely blamed on the rise in CO2 from human activities. And why not, given that CO2 is a greenhouse gas that can trap infrared radiation and warm the atmosphere? The problem is that the rise in CO2 is not enough to account for this temperature rise. To compensate, the AGW theory assumes an amplification by water vapour of two to three times.

Water vapour is the major greenhouse gas in the atmosphere and accounts for as much as 95% of the natural greenhouse warming that keeps the Earth habitable. According to this theory, a minor amount of warming by CO2 triggers a larger increase in water vapour. Computer models incorporate this amplified forcing and extrapolate over the next 100 years to predict temperature increase of 1.5 degrees to 4.5 degreesC. Further extrapolation of climate feedbacks has produced the wild speculations of an overheated planet that have led to the catastrophic predictions of The Day After Tomorrow and An Inconvenient Truth.

Supporting the other side of the debate, there are remarkably strong correlations between measures of past solar activity and global temperature. For example, the coldest periods of the Little Ice Age, some 300 years ago, occurred when no sunspots were observed on the face of the sun. Moreover, the rise in temperature over the past 100 years occurred when the sun increased its output to its highest levels in the past 1,000 years.

The problem in this theory is that radiant heat from the more active sun is not enough to explain the rise in 20th-century temperatures. However, a change in solar activity affects more than the light the sun emits. It also changes the sun's magnetosphere that sweeps out past the Earth and partly shields us from the harmful high-energy cosmic radiation originating from supernovae deep in the Milky Way. The theory is that these cosmic rays affect our climate by ionizing particles and gases in our atmosphere. These ionized molecules act as nucleation points for water droplets and lead to the formation of clouds. Clouds reflect sunlight back into space and have by far the greatest impact on the Earth's energy balance and climate. Changes in solar activity, then, have a second and more potent impact on our climate through changes in the cosmic ray flux and thus on cloudiness.

This brings us to the burden of scientific evidence in the climate debate. Until now, the evidence for both sides has relied essentially upon wiggle-matching -- how well the ups and downs in temperature over time match with the ups and downs of solar activity, or of CO2 in the atmosphere. Until now, both theories lacked experimental evidence.

The Danish discovery has changed this. Researchers led by the Space Centre's Henrik Svensmark published experimental evidence in the proceedings of the prestigious British Royal Society showing that high-energy cosmic rays do have the ability to ionize molecules in our atmosphere and nucleate clouds. Mr. Svensmark's team managed to reproduce the gases and chemistry of the lower atmosphere inside a chamber of seven cubic metres. Into this simulated atmosphere, they fired a beam of charged particles like the high-energy cosmic radiation that manages to penetrate the Earth's magnetic shielding. Their measurements of the charged particles they created and the rates of nucleation match with those required to have a measurable impact on climate. They provide experimental evidence to support the theory.

The Danes are not the only team to have sought experimental evidence for cosmic ray forcing of the climate. University of Ottawa researcher Jan Veizer and colleague Nir Shaviv use geology and meteorites to show a cosmic ray connection with climate over the past 600-million years. The research team at CERN, the EU's foremost centre for high-energy physics, announced last month that their new CLOUD experiments would test the theory of cloud formation by cosmic rays. NASA is also taking the solar connection more seriously. This past spring, two new satellites were launched to collect data on the link between cloud formation and climate. All this activity signals a recognition that the solar-cosmic ray-cloudiness connection must be taken seriously in climate research.

While these Danish experiments provide new evidence to support the theory of solar-forcing of climate change, the CO2 warming theory remains untested and unverified. Beyond wiggle-matching, no experimental evidence has been produced to show that an increase in CO2 can accelerate the water cycle and increase greenhouse warming with water vapour. In fact, ice core evidence from the past shows that it doesn't.

In the natural sciences, if you can't measure it, you can't prove it.

© National Post 2006

2007-10-26T23:51:00.000-07:00

War? yes...it has to be called what it is..."terrorism"....Environmentalist must be giddy about their huge bon-fires they created with their do-nothing idealism that left millions of acres of southern California ready for big burning. I can only hear them say quietly to themselves that the people who had houses in these areas had no right to be there and the fires were justice. That is the mindset of hate filled eviro-mentals and why many now say that liberalism is a disease.
We cannot look away from this and we have to begin the real effort of thinning forests to make them pristine and to clear firebreaks to stop uncontrolled burning of desert dry areas like we have seen year after year since 1970 when Enviro-mentals took away all common sense care of the forests and dry brush areas. Now people have died because some dorky bird or rodent was protected by stupidity and hate of man-kind.
These fires this year show the real importance of following through with a bill that was passed years ago to thin forests and make them healthier so these fires cannot burn uncontrollably.

Western Furniture Site

The Old Farmers Almanac uses old sunspot theory to predict weather

2007-10-23T02:37:00.000-07:00

The Old Farmers Almanac uses old sunspot theory to predict weather to a 80% accuracy since 1787.

This year's edition, on newsstands Wednesday, predicts a warmer than average winter in much of the country. Believers will look for below-average snowfall, except for a narrow swath extending from northeast Texas to Northern New England.

Using a secret formula based on sunspots, weather patterns and meteorology, the almanac points to a hot summer in most areas, but cool and dry in the upper Midwest. It's also looking for drought prompting water management and wildfire problems in Florida and the western states. Elsewhere, look for more rain than normal.

Established in 1792, the Old Farmer's Almanac is North America's oldest continuously published periodical. The little yellow magazine still comes with the hole in the corner so it can hang in outhouses.

Also they do predict in the next couple years that the big cooling pattern will replace the warming cycle since the 1970's.

2007-10-23T02:36:00.000-07:00

Below is a very good article on part of the story of Hansen and may explain how and why he has been bought off by Soros, though he is a "paid by your taxes" employee of NASA who should be trying to service you with the truth and not his own idealogy and big pocket money backers.

"For years, Hansen's group at GISS, as well as other leading climate scientists such as Mann and Briffa (creators of historical temperature reconstructions) have flaunted the rules of science by holding the details of their methodologies and algorithm's secret, making full scrutiny impossible. The best possible outcome of this incident will be if new pressure is brought to bear on these scientists to stop saying "trust me" and open their work to their peers for review. This is particularly important for activities such as Hansen's temperature data base at GISS. While measurement of temperature would seem straight forward, in actual fact the signal to noise ration is really low. Upward "adjustments" and fudge factors added by Hansen to the actual readings dwarf measured temperature increases, such that, for example, most reported warming in the US is actually from these adjustments, not measured increases.
In a week when Newsweek chose to argue that climate skeptics need to shut up, this incident actually proves why two sides are needed for a quality scientific debate. Hansen and his folks missed this Y2K bug because, as a man-made global warming cheerleader, he expected to see temperatures going up rapidly so he did not think to question the data. Mr. Hansen is world-famous, is a friend of luminaries like Al Gore, gets grants in quarter million dollar chunks from various global warming believers ( Soros). All his outlook and his incentives made him want the higher temperatures to be true. It took other people with different hypotheses about climate to see the recent temperature jump for what it was: An error."

Nasa weather Scandal

2007-10-23T02:35:00.000-07:00

The claims against anthropogenic global warming skeptics are often the same: they're all shills for big oil or other industry wishing to poke holes in the 'consensus theory' of global warming (which isn't a consensus at all). Under the so-called "politicization of science" program, George Soros' (the favorite fundraiser of many democrats) has reportedly given as much as $720,000 to Hansen to help package his alarmist claims and get them pushed by the mainstream media .

How many people, for instance, know that James Hansen, a man billed as a lonely "NASA whistleblower" standing up to the mighty U.S. government, was really funded by Soros' Open Society Institute , which gave him "legal and media advice"?

That's right, Hansen was packaged for the media by Soros' flagship "philanthropy," by as much as $720,000, most likely under the OSI's "politicization of science" program.

So he got some big paychecks from Soros - but was there a quid pro quo? The evidence certainly indicates as much:

That may have meant that Hansen had media flacks help him get on the evening news to push his agenda and lawyers pressuring officials to let him spout his supposedly "censored" spiel for weeks in the name of advancing the global warming agenda.

Hansen even succeeded, with public pressure from his nightly news performances, in forcing NASA to change its media policies to his advantage. Had Hansen's OSI-funding been known, the public might have viewed the whole production differently. The outcome could have been different.

And, James Hansen is one of those NASA scientists who have control in the keeping and reporting of temperature models and readings, which have been found to be false and many have yet to be corrected. Makes it look more like George Soros bought off James Hansen and other scientists who push the propaganda of man made global warming.

Co2 warming?

2007-10-23T01:56:00.000-07:00

I found some graphs that may help you understand this Co2 greenhouse effect.

Ok First this one shows the entire greenhouse gas percentages.

Water vapor the largest and most significant greenhouse gas at 95%

Now we will remove the water vapor and figure just the 5% remaining gases

This is the properties of each gas (heat retention potency)

Co2 with a value of 1 = 72.369% of 5%
Methane with a value of 21 = 7.199% of 5%
Nitrous oxide with a value of 310 = 19.000% 0f 5%
(Other gases with variable values) =1.432% of 5%

Now the percentage of man made sources within the 5% gases

Okay try to follow this
72.359% of 5% = 3.618% is total effect of all Co2 greenhouse gas
Now, of that amount man contributes 3.225% to the total of Co2
so we possibly contribute 0.117% of the "Co2" greenhouse effect

Ok now since we had a possible .06 degree warming over the last 100 years, from 1906 to 2006.(Actually the next 40 year cooling period will equal out the imbalance of
two warming periods and only one cooling period during that 100 years. So we might
actually say it is likely cooling or headed toward an ice age.)
If it be true at all that we had this change .06 degree change we can say actual 0.00702 degree of that amount could be from man's Co2. It is virtually nothing and getting rid of all man made source of Co2 for 0.00702 of degree in temperature change while going into another cooling period means nothing at all.

Water vapor the largest and most significant greenhouse gas at 95%
and 0.001% of all water vapor is manmade
The remaining 5% is
Co2 0.177%,
Methane 0.066%
Nitrous oxide 0.047%
Other gases 0.047%

Western Home decor

Who said it was warmer????

2007-06-28T22:38:00.000-07:00

Is the keeper of temperatures telling you the truth or do they even care as long as it goes along with the lie about Global warming... In my area of the country we had the coldest winter in a long time with many days breaking cold records by more then 15 degrees or more that something didnt sound right about it being warmer year. read this lead in to the story then click on the link to go to the page with the whole story....

Oops; 2006 Not "The Hottest Year Ever"
By Bill Steigerwald
FrontPageMagazine.com | June 21, 2007

Remember in January when the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and its good friends in media trumpeted that 2006 was the warmest year on record for the contiguous United States?

NOAA based that finding – which allegedly capped a nine-year warming streak "unprecedented in the historical record" – on the daily temperature data that its National Climatic Data Center gathers from about 1,221 mostly rural weather observation stations around the country.

Few people have ever seen or even heard of these small, simple-but-reliable weather stations, which quietly make up what NOAA calls its United States Historical Climatology Network (USHCN).

Click here for complete story

Propaganda can make you stupid

2007-06-06T21:02:00.000-07:00

I heard a news report on how many people are going back to push mowers to mow their lawns. If your lawn is no bigger than your living room this could be a good idea. Of course the news story couldn't get by without be about global warming. They had to include one interview for a lady who has the world by her hand knowing the exact problem in the world she can fix with a push lawn mower she just bought. Her words,"It helps on noise pollution and the ozone." What a smart lady, bet she got that from reading Al Gore's palm. Or maybe she thinks her old gas driven lawn mower was really a freon gas producer. Or most likely she is like most brain dead, easy to fool, sheep type people who dont care about facts or truth but only want to show their "feelings" and that they "care".
What a bunch of crap. She was told so much bullshit she really doesnt know a CFC from a CO2 or an ozone layer from the cloud around her head.
This is what is dangerous about this kind of propaganda and why it has to be fought with the truth. It nakes people stupid. This is exactly how the old USSR kept the power over so many people for so many years. This is exactly the same kind of propaganda used to control the minds of people who had no freedom.

The only inconvient truth is that Al Gore is the liar of the century

2007-05-29T17:24:00.000-07:00

Read this small list of the many expert's comments about Al "the Liar" Gore's silly movie

Dr. Chris de Freitas, climate scientist, associate professor, University of Auckland, New Zealand: "I can assure Mr. Gore that no one from the South Pacific islands have fled to New Zealand because of rising seas. In fact, if Gore consults the data, he will see it shows sea level falling in some parts of the Pacific."

Dr. Nils-Axel Mörner, emeritus professor of paleogeophysics & geodynamics, Stockholm University, Sweden: ""We find no alarming sea level rise going on, in the Maldives, Tovalu, Venice, the Persian Gulf and even satellite altimetry if applied properly."

Dr. Paul Reiter, Professor - Institut Pasteur, Unit of Insects and Infectious Diseases, Paris, France, comments on Gore’s belief that Nairobi and Harare were founded just above the mosquito line to avoid malaria and how the mosquitoes are now moving to higher altitudes: "Gore is completely wrong here - malaria has been documented at an altitude 2500 m - Nairobi and Harare are at altitudes of about 1500 m. The new altitudes of malaria are lower than those recorded 100 years ago. None of the "30 so called new diseases"" Gore references are attributable to global warming, none."

Dr. Mitchell Taylor, Manager, Wildlife Research Section, Department of Environment, Igloolik, Nunavut, Canada: "Our information is that 7 of 13 populations of polar bears in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (more than half the world’s estimated total) are either stable, or increasing …. Of the three that appear to be declining, only one has been shown to be affected by climate change. No one can say with certainty that climate change has not affected these other populations, but it is also true that we have no information to suggest that it has."

Dr. Petr Chylek, adjunct professor, Dept. of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: "Mr. Gore suggests that Greenland melt area increased considerably between 1992 and 2005. But 1992 was exceptionally cold in Greenland and the melt area of ice sheet was exceptionally low due to the cooling caused by volcanic dust emitted from Mt. Pinatubo. If, instead of 1992, Gore had chosen for comparison the year 1991, one in which the melt area was 1% higher than in 2005, he would have to conclude that the ice sheet melt area is shrinking and that perhaps a new ice age is just around the corner."

Dr. Gary D. Sharp, Center for Climate/Ocean Resources Study, Salinas, California: ""The oceans are now heading into one of their periodic phases of cooling. … Modest changes in temperature are not about to wipe them [coral] out. Neither will increased carbon dioxide, which is a fundamental chemical building block that allows coral reefs to exist at all."

Dr. R. M. Carter, professor, Marine Geophysical Laboratory, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia: "Both the Antarctic and Greenland ice caps are thickening. The temperature at the South Pole has declined by more than 1 degree C since 1950. And the area of sea-ice around the continent has increased over the last 20 years."

Dr./Cdr. M. R. Morgan, FRMS, formerly advisor to the World Meteorological Organization/climatology research scientist at University of Exeter, U.K.: "From data published by the Canadian Ice Service there has been no precipitous drop off in the amount or thickness of the ice cap since 1970 when reliable over-all coverage became available for the Canadian Arctic."

Rob Scagel, M.Sc., forest microclimate specialist, Pacific Phytometric Consultants, Surrey, British Colombia, Canada comments on Gore’’s belief that the Mountain Pine Beetle (MPB) is an "invasive exotic species" that has become a plague due to fewer days of frost: "The MPB is a species native to this part of North America and is always present. The MPB epidemic started as comparatively small outbreaks and through forest management inaction got completely out of hand."

Compiled by Tom Harris, Natural Resources Stewardship Project, 7 Nov 06

Computer Models generated to prove what???

2007-05-28T01:32:00.000-07:00

Did you ever hear a Global Warming Theory Scientist who used climate model info to make his theory sound like he knows facts? Did he ever mention that within that model showing 1000 years of warming that we would have a natural ice age that would cool down the earth? Do they ever estimate the next ice age within their models to prove global warming? Or is it that they forget to model ice ages into their imaginary models of temperature figures that somehow prove that the earth has had static temps forever. And now only the power of man can control the climate by his behavior or existence.

South Africa Freezes

2007-05-25T00:42:00.000-07:00

In just a few days 54 cold temp records in South Africa were put in hell to freeze over liars of Global Warming who call plain old weather like hurricanes and weekly warming or cooling over the planet a climate change. Daily the real God makes them look like the lying fools they are... unfortunately 21 died in the freezing temps that came completely unexpected, and maybe more so, since Al Gore and the world team of dumb asses have made so many people think they will have more and more heat. I am just sure more people these days who have fallen for this crap don't plan or think of what to do if extremely cold weather hits them overnight.
OK, this is one just another notable weather event that you think I am claiming is the next ice age coming. No, don't jump to that conclusion, yet. But rest assured that some freak of the Global Warming band wagon WILL take this event and put it in their claims of Global Warming.... the word DUH!! was made up just for this ..CLIMATE CHANGES!!! It does it no matter what man does or doesn't do. And you and everyone else who has seen any part of this planet knows it has a history of change that came before mankind or Big Oil or planes or hairspray or your lawn mower.
Man does not change the weather or the climate and the weather or the climate could take mankind off this planet any time it wants to.
We've been so lucky to have lived during a time of very mild weather and it is bound to change to another Ice Age within a few hundred years. No one can say exactly when. But it will and that's the truth.

2007-05-19T15:56:00.000-07:00

They are coming to take your "way of life"

2007-04-24T16:46:00.000-07:00

You don't believe that Global Warming is the tool of new Communism?
They are coming after your life BIG TIME!!
It was just a joke last year when one dumb-ass congressman tried to pass a bill to regulate lawn mowing... it didn't pass.
But all they had to do was take it to the EPA and now we hear the EPA is taking the job to attack you as a criminal who uses a fossil fuel burning, smog machine that plows down that rain forest in your yard. YOU WILL PAY !!!
And now you think its funny that some mentally-warped politi-celeb Sheryl Crow said you have to cut your use of TOILET PAPER to stop Global warming???????? She might say she was joking about just using one tiny piece, but that idea alone will start the tax-aholics on their mission to make her silly comment come true.
So they may not put the TP police in each of our bathrooms to make sure we don't use more than one small square each time we use it. They may not put cameras in your bathroom and pay welfare moms to watch all the screens to catch ya cheating on your TP use. But you bet they will put Global Warming taxes on anything you use today. That is their plan!!! And its coming on fast because NO ONE with enough power can get the truth out...and get people to care enough to stop this in it's tracks. We will pay trillions of our hard earned dollars for nothing but some hot air from some sick leftist wackos who came up with this whole scam and the propaganda behind it.... NOT ONE SINGLE THING CAN BE PROVED THAT MAN HAS DONE ONE THING TO CAUSE THE LESS THAN SINGLE DEGREE OF WARMING IN THE LAST 100 YEARS.
They have fossils from life that roamed Antarctica millions of years ago... THE CLIMATE HAS CHANGED IN NATURE FOR BILLIONS OF YEARS AND MAN DID NOTHING ALL THAT TIME. NOW???? NOW ONLY MAN CAN CHANGE THE CLIMATE BY USING A HAND FULL OF RECYCLED, BLEACHED, WOOD PULP TO WIPE HIS ASS?
THIS IS GETTING MORE INSANE EACH DAY AND YET YOU STILL HEAR THE DUMB ASS MEDIA PUSH A SMALL CHANGE IN WEATHER AS GLOBAL WARMING... YOU STILL HEAR RETARDED, PSEUDO EXPERTS TELL YOU THAT COLD WEATHER RECORDS ARE THE SAME AS WARM DAYS...THAT IT IS ALL GLOBAL WARMING ...WAKE UP YOUR FRIENDS... THIS MATTERS OR THEY WOULDN'T BE SPENDING SO MUCH TIME TRYING TO MAKE YOU BELIEVE THIS LIE!!!!

Aint no Santa hun...sorry no easta' bunny ...

2006-03-25T09:54:00.000-08:00

There is no Santa, there is no Easter Bunny
AND THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS
MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING!

I watched this word "global warming" over the last 20 years, become the household word for the most extreme use of environmentalism. The only people I see pushing this have the desire to bolshevise the world or those who are paid to say what is needed to try to make an unproven theory grow as a popular belief. That has to be a religion and not a science. We hear they have a "Consensus" of scientist who now believe "global warming" is manmade. Science is not consensus, it is not religion or political faith. It is not up for a vote. It is 100% fact or possibly a mere study of a theory. In this case of climate change we have a theory which cannot be proved until years of weather and temps have been put together to provide a historical. Though it is said that a 30 year period of weather stats could be shown as one climate. We know this whole lame arguement is based on a .07 degree warming over the last 100 years. But then, we do have evidence that does not need anything but common sense and a bit of history. Have you heard Al Gore or any of the pushers behind the theory of global warming blaming Nature? They ignore all that Nature can do and has done for millions of years and their claim is that only man could melt some snow on top of a mountain. Do you hear the common news that we had a mini Ice age just 600 or so years ago? And that there has obviously been warming since that time or we would still be in the ice age. The period after this ice age Of course the warming started long before the automobile roamed the earth. Have you ever heard a single mainstream journalist tell you we are within a few years of the next Natural Ice Age? We have records of a Major Ice Age every 10,500 years or so going back a million years. We are 10,000 year plus...from the last major Ice Age. With the exception of this mini ice age between 1400 and 1700AD. And if you really check it out and think about it you will realize how dynamic the earth's climate really is. A Dark Ages Cold period(400-700AD), followed by a Medieval Warm period(800-1200AD), and that folowed by the Little Ice Age(1300-1800AD), and then current warming from then until now. Any geologist (who hasnt been payed off by the Big Global Warming Machine) can tell you about the ice ages and the natural cooling and warming the earth has gone through for billions of years. And there is no reason this natural climate change will not happen again on this earth as it has for all time.
You no doubt heard some "enviro-mental" suggested that man-made global warming can cause the next ice age. Proving they dont really know whether there is any change to warmer or colder temps across the planet. They just want to claim any weather that happens as it has in nature for all time is now only man's fault.

The argument for ozone layer depletion was mostly political, as no one knows how long the ozone hole has existed... Since it was never discovered or even looked for until recently it could have existed for hundreds, thousands, millions of years.
These liberals and socialists wanted us to think "man" (primarily the U.S.A.) and CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer. However they blocked the use of CFC products in the U.S. and other free market countries 25 years ago. And it hasnt changed anything. The holes remain and they grow and shrink just like anything in nature. Now they have given up that claim they made since common sense would tell us, if it exists, the ozone hole has been there, long before man's freon and hairspray. It always changes, and shrinks, and grows just like everything else on this dynamic planet ...the ozone layer is replenished by interaction between the sun and the oceans. We cannot stop the process without blocking out the sun or maybe covering the entire oceans.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The basis of the claim of Global Warming is that the whole planet warmed less than 1 degree in the last one hundred years.
We also have satellite temperature records from 40 years back and they show a 1-degree cooling pattern. But that's still not enough about temperature records. These figures also included ocean temps which surely could be even 5 degrees warmer than 100 years ago and that would not mean warmer land temperatures at all. In fact the warmer ocean temps can push us into the next ice age.
We have been hearing a lot of news about underwater volcanoes erupting and heating certain areas of ocean with boiling lava, and they emit tons of debris that kills all life around them. Man could not cause volcanic eruptions such as these. Nor create anything with such destructive power.
Anyone with a simple education about nature can see the dynamics of the earth's climate will change in nature no matter what man does or doesnt do.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ask yourself why "the pushers" of Global Warming go after the craziest claims??
Why would they make carbon dioxide the new enemy? Can you say Evil SUV?? Yes the car puts out co2 emissions and anything that comes out of a car tail pipe must be bad!! But again co2 is all around us, and plants live off the stuff. There were other emissions from the auto exhaust that have already been controlled ...Now they have (excuse the term) 'exhausted' ways to attack the Big Oil powered automobile so they go after this? From this they say we will create a "greenhouse effect". First it is known that C02 doesnt cause global warming... check the facts for the earth's long history... colder times have had higher amounts of C02 in the the atmosphere. But what if it did? It still wouldnt matter because all man's effort to be the big C02 producer hasnt done him any good.. natural sources of C02 dwarf man's effort. Even termites rate higher on the list of earth's C02 producers.
Again they use a ridiculous claims to help make the "global warming religion" a dream come true. They have already passed laws in a few states that put a tax on SUV's for future co2 emission controls.
In the words of one socialist activist "Global Warming happens all over.. you can find it in different places at different times.." it moves around??? Yes it moves around just like WEATHER. And yes it isn't about science or facts, it is just one political tool for propagating a socialist religion.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sure some glaciers have melted down over the last 40 years. However the largest glaciers in the world have been growing. Plus hundreds of glaciers all over the mountain regions of the world have been increasing in size .
Click here for a great information source: You can get more studies and sciences and names of the growing glaciers

Send this to all your friends so everyone will know:
We cannot be fooled and have our freedom
easily taken away from us!
check this for more info:

Is a New Ice Age Under Way?
by Laurence Hecht

Do you believe in Global Warming?

2006-03-16T12:43:00.000-08:00

I dont think man can warm the earth no matter how hard he tries, but with this blog you can try to prove it can be done and even show how it can be done so we can save the world from the coming ice age !

Resources and great things to read....

"Forecaster Blasts Gore on Global Warming" By CAIN BURDEAU, Associated Press Writer
Dr. William Gray, an emeritus professor at the atmospheric science department at Colorado State University, has long railed against the theory that heat-trapping gases generated by human activity are causing the world to warm.

Danish scientist: Global warming is a myth

Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide
Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?
By Timothy Ball

Click here to get more facts on C02 Check out this site from Dr Timothy Ball, an honest word on C02.

French Scientist has Epiphany about Global Warming
Claude Allegre, France's most revered scientist has preached that global warming has been the fault of man for over twenty years, but now he's changed his tune.

"With a wealth of data now in, Dr. Allegre has recanted his views. To his surprise, the many climate models and studies failed dismally in establishing a man-made cause of catastrophic global warming."

Read the article that Dr Allegre wrote:
"The Snows of Kilimanjaro" in l' Express

More C02 Science
Check out this article for example:
A 1250-Year History of Summer Temperature in the European Alps